Thursday, February 7, 2008

Terrorist'd or Terroristed

Mike is claiming that if "terrorist" were a verb it would be terrorist'd - I'm wondering on that spelling. Maybe terroristed. Like - "See Spot get terroristed." Or, "If I'm on a plane that gets terrorist'd I'd just want it to be over fast."

Anyway. Bonni's over and it's making me VERY happy. Nice.

Missing Stacy. Are you reading this? You better be.

6 comments:

jawsthemesam said...

im no english major, but wouldn't "terrorist'd" be a contraction? thats what the apostraphe signifies right? two words put together as one? so what would the second word be? something involving a d? i dont see it... but, i suppose the apostraphe could also be used to indicate ownership, ie the dog's ears... so i suppose if the terrorists did get to you, you would have in a sense, been "owned" by said terrorists, so in fact you would have been terrorist'd. right? in closing, you win mike. does that make sense? but wait, would the word in question be a verb? fuck.

Boobs Pooter said...

so what, you're too good for 'terrorize/terrorized'?

Extreme Ash said...

I was a cultural studies major - and I can say that I think the different spellings really could have two different meanings. I also argued that "terrorist'd" implied a contraction, "terrorist had" ie "I'd - I had" and I didn't like it. But then Mike argued the ownership sense of the word and I agreed. But then I argued the verb usage. And then I won.

In closing. Yes - I am too good for 'terrorize/terrorized'

ledare said...

maybe you should just punch your balls off. Get your ass down here. I aint playin.

typoscura said...

in the same vein as being "M.S.G.'d"...I believe you can be terrorist'd as well. Just see Teen Girl Squad for any pointers.

Anonymous said...

Someone finally gets it.